Alfalfa variety 54Q14

ABSTRACT

A novel alfalfa variety designated 54Q14 and seed, plants and plant parts thereof. Methods for producing an alfalfa plant that comprise crossing alfalfa variety 54Q14 with another alfalfa plant. Methods for producing an alfalfa plant containing in its genetic material one or more traits introgressed into 54Q14 through backcross conversion and/or transformation, and to the alfalfa seed, plant and plant part produced thereby. Alfalfa seeds, plants or plant parts produced by crossing alfalfa variety 54Q14 or a trait conversion of 54Q14 with another alfalfa plant or population. Alfalfa populations derived from alfalfa variety 54Q14, methods for producing other alfalfa populations derived from alfalfa variety 54Q14 and the alfalfa populations and their parts derived by the use of those methods.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 62/095,279, filed on Dec. 22, 2014,which is incorporated in its entirety herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention is in the field of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) breeding,specifically relating to an alfalfa variety designated 54Q14.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L., also known as lucerne) is one of theworld's most valuable forage legumes. It is grown for hay, pasture andsilage, and is valued highly as a livestock feed. Alfalfa is highlyeffective in nitrogen fixation, and is frequently planted in croprotation to replenish nutrients depleted from the soil by other cropssuch as corn.

Alfalfa originated in the Near East, in the area extending from Turkeyto Iran and north into the Caucasus. From the great diversity of formswithin the genus Medicago, two species, M. sativa and M. falcata, havebecome important forage plants. These species are mainly tetraploid,with 32 chromosomes, although diploid forms are known.

Alfalfa is a herbaceous perennial legume characterized by a deep taproot showing varying degrees of branching. Erect or semi-erect stems,bearing an abundance of leaves, grow to a height of 2-4 feet. The numberof stems arising from a single woody crown may vary from just a few to50 or more. New stems develop when older ones mature or have been cut orgrazed. Flowers are borne on axillary racemes which vary greatly in sizeand number of flowers. Flower color is predominantly purple, orbluish-purple, but other colors occur. The fruit is a legume, or pod,usually spirally coiled in M. sativa. Seeds are small, with about220,000/lb., and the color varies from yellow to brown. Alfalfa iswidely adapted to temperature and soil conditions, except for humidtropical conditions. Reproduction in alfalfa is mainly bycross-fertilization, but substantial self-pollination may also occur.Cross-pollination is effected largely by bees.

The commercial production of seeds for growing alfalfa plants normallyinvolves four stages, the production of breeder, foundation, certifiedand registered seeds. Breeder seed is the initial increase of seed ofthe strain which is developed by the breeder and from which foundationseed is derived. Foundation seed is the second generation of seedincrease and from which certified seed is derived. Certified seeds areused in commercial crop production and are produced from foundation orcertified seed. Foundation seed normally is distributed by growers orseedsmen as planting stock for the production of certified seed.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the invention, there is provided a novel alfalfa variety,designated 54Q14 and processes for making 54Q14. This invention relatesto seed of alfalfa variety 54Q14, to the plants of alfalfa variety54Q14, to plant parts of alfalfa variety 54Q14, and to processes formaking an alfalfa plant that comprise crossing alfalfa variety 54Q14with another alfalfa plant. This invention also relates to processes formaking an alfalfa plant containing in its genetic material one or moretraits introgressed into 54Q14 through backcross conversion and/ortransformation, and to the alfalfa seed, plant and plant part producedby such introgression. This invention further relates to alfalfa seed,plant or plant part produced by crossing the alfalfa variety 54Q14 or anintrogressed trait conversion of 54Q14 with another alfalfa population.This invention also relates to alfalfa populations derived from alfalfavariety 54Q14 to processes for making other alfalfa populations derivedfrom alfalfa variety 54Q14 and to the alfalfa populations and theirparts derived by the use of those processes.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND FURTHER EMBODIMENTSDefinitions

Acid-Detergent Fiber (“ADF”) approximates the amount of cellulose fiberand ash present in a feed. Forages with high ADF values are lessdigestible than forages with low ADF values and, therefore, providefewer nutrients to the animal through digestion. Because of thisrelationship, ADF serves as an estimate of digestibility and can be usedby nutritionists to predict the energy that will be available from aforage.

AOSCA. Abbreviation for Association of Official Seed CertifyingAgencies.

Crude Protein (“CP”) is determined by measuring the total nitrogenconcentration of a forage and multiplying it by 6.25. This techniquemeasures not only the nitrogen present in true proteins, but also thatpresent in non-protein forms such as ammonia, urea and nitrate. Becausemost of the non-protein forms of nitrogen are converted to true proteinby the rumen microorganisms, CP is considered by nutritionists toprovide an accurate measure of the protein that will be available toruminant animals from a given forage.

DM. Abbreviation for Dietary Dry Matter. Used to calculate yield.

Fall Dormancy (Dormancy or “FD”). Most alfalfa plants go dormant in thefall in preparation for winter. The onset of dormancy is triggered by acombination of day length and temperature and is genotype dependent.Fall dormancy scores indicate the dormancy response of alfalfa genotypesby quantifying the height of alfalfa measured in October relative to aset of standard check varieties. The standard fall dormancy testrequires that plants are cut off in early September with plant heightmeasured in early-mid October. Early fall dormant types show very littlegrowth after the September clipping, later fall dormant type demonstratesubstantial growth.

Alfalfa is classified into fall dormancy groups, numbered 1 to 11, whereDormancy Group 1 is most dormant and suited for cold climates (suchvarieties would stop growing and go dormant over winter), and DormancyGroup 7-11 are very non-dormant and suited for very hot climates (suchvarieties would have high growth rates over a very long growing seasonand would have relatively high winter activity). The NA&MLVRB recognizesstandard or check varieties for Dormancy Groups 1-11, Check cultivarsare listed in the NAAIC Standard Tests to Characterize AlfalfaCultivars, maintained online on the NAAIC's website. The check varietiesfor the various fall dormancy ratings/Dormancy Groups (corresponding tothe rating scale used by the Certified Alfalfa Seed Council (CASC)) areas follows:

Check Cultivars. A single set of check cultivars representing falldormancy classes (FDC) 1 to 11 are designated. These check cultivarshave been selected to maintain the intended relationship between theoriginal set of nine check cultivars (Standard Tests, March 1991,updated in 1998) and to have minimal variation across environments. Theactual fall dormancy rating (FDR) based on the average University ofCalifornia regression and the Certified Alfalfa Seed Council Class thateach check cultivar represents are listed below in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Check Cultivar Fall Dormancy Ratings (FDR) and Fall DormancyClasses (FDC) VARIETY FDR¹ FDC² Maverick 0.8 1.0 Vernal 2.0 2.0 5246 3.43.0 Legend 3.8 4.0 Archer 5.3 5.0 ABI 700 6.3 6.0 Doña Ana 6.7 7.0Pierce 7.8 8.0 CUF 101 8.9 9.0 UC 1887 9.9 10.0 UC 1465 11.2 11.0 TheFDR¹ number corresponds to the value calculated using the University ofCalifornia regression equation. The FDC² number corresponds to falldormancy class used by the Certified Alfalfa Seed Council (CASC).

In Vitro True Digestibility (“IVTD”) is a measurement of digestibilityutilizing actual rumen microorganisms. Although ADF serves as a goodestimate of digestibility, IVID provides a more accurate assessment of aforage's feeding value by actually measuring the portion of a foragethat is digested. This process is more expensive and time consuming thanthe analysis for ADF concentrations of a feed, but provides a moremeaningful measure of forage digestibility. Techniques for measuring invitro digestibility are based on incubating a forage sample in asolution containing rumen microorganisms for an extended period of time(usually 48 hours).

TA. Abbreviation for Tons per Acre. Used to calculate yield.

Milk Per Ton is an estimate of the milk production that could besupported by a given forage when fed as part of a total mixed ration.The equation for calculating milk per ton uses NDF and ADF to calculatetotal energy intake possible from the forage. After subtracting theamount of energy required for daily maintenance of the cow, the quantityof milk that could be produced from the remaining energy is calculated.The ratio of milk produced to forage consumed is then reported in theunits of pounds of milk produced per ton of forage consumed. Milk perton is useful because it characterizes forage quality in two terms thata dairy farmer is familiar with: pounds of milk and tons of forage. Bycombining milk per ton and dry matter yield per acre, we arrive at “milkper acre.” This term is widely used to estimate the economic value of aforage.

NAAIC. Abbreviation for North America Alfalfa Improvement Conference,which is the governing body over the NA&MLVRB.

NA&MLVRB. Abbreviation for National Alfalfa and Miscellaneous LegumeVariety Review Board. The NA&MLVRB is administered by the Association ofOfficial Seed Certifying Agencies (AOSCA).

NAVRB. Abbreviation for National Alfalfa Variety Review Board. NAVRBrecently changed its name to “National Alfalfa and Miscellaneous LegumeVariety Review Board” (NA&MLVRB).

Neutral-Detergent Fiber (“NDF”) represents the total amount of fiberpresent in the alfalfa. Because fiber is the portion of the plant mostslowly digested in the rumen, it is this fraction that fills the rumenand becomes a limit to the amount of feed an animal can consume. Thehigher the NDF concentration of a forage, the slower the rumen willempty reducing what an animal will be able to consume. For this reason,NDF is used by nutritionists as an estimate of the quantity of foragethat an animal will be able to consume. Forages with high NDF levels canlimit intake to the point that an animal is unable to consume enoughfeed to meet their energy and protein requirements.

Percentage of alfalfa plant having resistance to potato leafhopper.Alfalfa varieties are heterogeneous populations formed by intercrossinga number of alfalfa clones. Pest resistance in alfalfa varieties iscommonly measured in standard tests as the percent of plants in thepopulation that express the resistance trait. The National AlfalfaVariety Review Board in accordance with the recommendation of the NorthAmerican Alfalfa Improvement Conference has adopted a convention thatuses percent resistant plants to describe levels of pest resistance.This convention is as follows: (0-5%)=susceptible, (6-15%)=lowresistance, (16-30%)=moderate resistance, (31-50%)=resistance, and(>51%)=high resistance. With most pests, economic losses due to pestdamage are minimized or eliminated with varieties containing resistanceto high resistance. Individual plants can also have varying levels ofresistance. The convention used for measuring PLH damage in thisapplication was patterned after standard tests used for measuringdamage/resistance to other pests. Individual plants are scored on a(1-5) scale, where 1=no damage evident and 5=severe stunting andyellowing. Plants scored as 1 and 2 are classified as resistant. Theaverage severity index (ASI) of a variety is the average damage scorefor 100 random plants. The ASI is often used in combination with percentresistance to characterize pest resistance of alfalfa cultivars.

Using this standard convention, an alfalfa variety described as beingresistant to PLH has between (31%-50%) of the plants in the varietybeing scored 1 or 2 in a standard test to measure PLH reaction.Individual alfalfa plants or clones (clonal propagules of individualgenotypes) with a resistance score of 1 have very high resistance; ascore of 3 show moderate resistance; and a score of 5 show noresistance.

Potato Leafhopper Resistance is a reaction of the alfalfa host plantwhich enables it to avoid serious damage from potato leafhopper feeding.The resistant plant reaction is to demonstrate normal growth in thepresence of high populations of potato leafhoppers, whereas susceptibleplants show significant stunting and yellowing in reaction to insectfeeding.

Relative Feed Value (“RFV”) is a numeric value assigned to forages basedupon their ADF and NDF values. In this calculation, NDF is used toestimate the dry matter intake expected for a given forage, and the ADFconcentration is used to estimate the digestibility of the forage. Bycombining these two relationships, an estimate of digestible dry matterintake is generated. This value is then reported relative to a standardforage (fall bloom alfalfa=100), and can be used to rank forages basedon their anticipated feeding value. Relative feed value has beenaccepted in many areas as a means of estimating forage feeding value andis commonly used in determining the price of alfalfa at tested hayauctions.

Relative Forage Quality (“RFQ”) is a numeric value that estimates theenergy content of forage for total digestible nutrients as recommendedby the National Research Council. Values are assigned to forages basedupon the actual fiber digestibility (NDFd) and Total DigestibleNutrients (TDN). By combining these two relationships, an estimate ofhow the forage will perform in animal rations is predicted. Relativeforage quality has been accepted in many areas as a means of estimatingforage feeding value and is commonly used in determining the price ofalfalfa at tested hay auctions or for on farm use.

Synthetic variety (“SYN”) is developed by intercrossing a number ofgenotypes with specific favorable characteristics and/or overall generalfavorable qualities. Synthetic (SYN) variety can be developed by usingclones, inbreds, open pollinated varieties, and/or individualheterozygous plants.

Total Digestible Nutrients (“TDN”) is an estimate of the energy contentof a feedstuff based on its relative proportions of fiber, fat,carbohydrate, crude protein, and ash. Because it is expensive to measureeach of these components, TDN is usually estimated from ADF or IVTD.Although still used in some areas as a criteria for evaluating alfalfahay at auctions, TDN has been shown to overestimate the energy contentof low quality forages and thus does not accurately reflect thenutritional value of all forage samples.

Winterhardiness (“WH”) is a measure of the ability of an alfalfa plantto survive the stresses associated with winter. Cold hardiness is a keyfeature of the winterhardiness trait. There is a general relationshipbetween fall dormancy and winterhardiness, the early fall dormant types(FD2-5) being more winterhardy than the later fall dormant types(FD6-9). The winterhardiness rating used in this patent are derived fromthe standard test for measuring winter survival. The standard testmeasures plant survival and spring vigor following a winter stressenough to substantially injure check varieties.

Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Alfalfa Variety 54Q14

Alfalfa variety 54Q14 is an intracross of 168 parent plants (Syn 1)selected by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. from Pioneerexperimentals for forage yield, persistence, forage quality,standability, and/or resistance to one or more of the following pests:bacterial wilt, Fusarium wilt, Verticillium wilt, Phytophthora root rot,Aphanomyces root rot (Race 1 & 2), and stem nematode. Parent plants wereidentified using phenotypic selection in selection nurseries forstandability (lodging tolerance), forage quality, increased pectin,persistence, agronomic characteristics, and improved forage yield.Breeder seed (Syn 2) was grown in cage isolate in 2010 in Connell, Wash.on 220 plants that were started in the greenhouse and transported to thefield. Seed was bulked in total.

Alfalfa variety 54Q14 is adapted to the moderately winterhardyintermountain regions of the U.S. and similar environments. This varietyhas been tested in Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan,Pennsylvania, and Ontario, Canada.

54Q14 is Moderately Dormant, similar to the FD4 check. Flower color (Syn2) is 97% purple, 1% variegated and 1% white with a trace of yellow andcream.

54Q14 is highly resistant to Aphanomyces root rot (Race 1), bacterialwilt, Verticillium wilt, Fusarium wilt, Phytophthora root rot, andAnthracnose. 54Q14 is resistant to Northern root knot nematode (M.hapla), Aphanomyces root rot (Race 2), pea aphid and spotted alfalfaaphid. 54Q14 is moderately resistant to Aphanomyces root rot (Race 2).This variety is suitable for use in producing hay, haylage, greenchop,and dehydrated product.

Use of 54Q14 in Alfalfa Breeding

Alfalfa is an auto-tetraploid and is frequently self-incompatible inbreeding. When selfed, little or no seed is produced, or the seed maynot germinate, or when it does, may have reduced vigor and may laterstop growing. Typically, fewer than five percent of selfed crossesproduce seed. When a very small population is crossbred, inbreedingdepression occurs, and traits of interest, such as quality, yield, andresistance to a large number of pests (e.g., seven or eight differentpests), are lost. Thus, producing a true breeding parent for hybrids isnot possible, which complicates breeding substantially.

Efforts to develop alfalfa varieties having improved traits andincreased production have focused on breeding for disease, insect, ornematode resistance, persistence, adaptation to specific environments,increased yield, and improved quality. Breeders have had some success inbreeding for increased herbage quality and forage yield, although thereare significant challenges.

Breeding programs typically emphasize maximizing heterogeneity of agiven alfalfa variety to improve yield and stability. However, thisgenerally results in wide variations in characteristics such asflowering dates, flowering frequency, development rate, growth rate,fall dormancy and winter hardiness. Prior art breeding methods do notemphasize improving the uniformity of these characteristics.

Some sources indicate that there are nine major germplasm sources ofalfalfa: M. falcata, Ladak, M. varia, Turkistan, Flemish, Chilean,Peruvian, Indian, and African. Tissue culture of explant source tissue,such as mature cotyledons and hypocotyls, demonstrates the regenerationfrequency of genotypes in most cultivars is only about 10 percent.Seitz-Kris, M. H. and E. T. Bingham, In vitro Cellular and DevelopmentalBiology 24 (10):1047-1052 (1988). Efforts have been underway to improveregeneration of alfalfa plants from callus tissue. E. T. Bingham, et.al., Crop Science 15:719-721 (1975).

Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for producingfirst-generation synthetic variety alfalfa seed comprising crossing afirst parent alfalfa plant with a second parent alfalfa plant andharvesting resultant first-generation (F1) alfalfa seed, wherein saidfirst or second parent alfalfa plant is one of the alfalfa plants of thepresent invention described above.

There is a need in the art for producing alfalfa having agronomicallydesirable traits and breeding methods that result in a high degree ofhybridity, uniformity of selected traits, and acceptable seed yields.

Male Sterility

The present invention also provides a method of obtaining alfalfapopulations using cytoplasmic male sterile alfalfa populations (Apopulations), maintainer alfalfa populations (B populations), and malefertile pollenizer populations (C populations) as described in detail inthe examples.

Male sterile A populations may be identified by evaluating pollenproduction using the Pollen Production Index (P.P.I.), which recognizesthe four distinct classes shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Pollen Product Index (P.P.I.) Classes No. CLASS PPICharacteristics 1 Male Sterile PPI = 0 No visible pollen can be observedPlants with the naked eye when flower is (MS) tripped with a black knifeblade. 2 Partial Male PPI = 0.1 A trace of pollen is found with theSterile naked eye when flower is tripped with Plant (PMS) a black knifeblade. 3 Partial PPI = 0.6 Less than a normal amount of pollen FertilePlant can be observed with the naked eye (PF) when flower is trippedwith a black knife blade. 4 Fertile Plant PPI = 1.0 Normal amounts ofpollen can be (F) observed when flower is tripped with a black knifeblade.

The cells of the cytoplasmic male sterile (A population) alfalfa plantscontain sterile cytoplasm and the non-restorer gene. The maintainerpopulation (B population) is a male and female fertile plant, and whencrossed with an A population plant, maintains the male sterility of thecytoplasmic male sterile plant in the progeny. The cells of a maintainerpopulation plant contain normal cytoplasm and the non-restorer gene.Methods for identifying cytoplasmic male sterile and maintainerpopulations of alfalfa are well known to those versed in the art ofalfalfa plant breeding (e.g., see U.S. Pat. No. 3,570,181, which isincorporated by reference herein). A pollenizer population (Cpopulation) is a fertile plant containing both male and female parts.

Cytoplasmic male sterile populations may be maintained by vegetativecuttings. Maintainer populations can be maintained by cuttings orself-pollination. Male sterile plants can be obtained bycross-pollinating cytoplasmic male sterile plants with maintainerplants. Pollenizer populations can be maintained by selfing or, if morethan two clones are used, by cross-pollination.

Preferably, at least one of the alfalfa plant populations used indeveloping alfalfa plants according to the method of the presentinvention has at least one desirable agronomic trait, which may include,for example, resistance to disease or insects, cold tolerance, increasedpersistence, greater forage yield or seed yield, improved foragequality, uniformity of growth rate, and uniformity of time of maturity.

In the controlled pollination step, the cytoplasmic male sterile plantsare typically grown in separate rows from the maintainer plants. Theplants are pollinated by pollen-carrying insects, such as bees.Segregating the male sterile and maintainer plants facilitates selectiveharvest of seed from the cytoplasmic male sterile plants.

The male sterile seed and male fertile seed is preferably provided as arandom mixture of the seed in a ratio of about 4:1, which would providefor random distribution of the male sterile and male fertile plantsgrown therefrom and random pollination of the alfalfa plants. As one ofskill in the art will appreciate, one could also practice the method ofthe invention using designed distribution of male sterile and malefertile populations within a field and subsequent pollination bypollen-carrying insects.

One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that any suitable malesterile population, maintainer population, and pollenizer populationcould be successfully employed in the practice of the method of theinvention.

Tissue Culture

Yet another embodiment is a tissue culture of regenerable cells derived,in whole or in part, from an alfalfa plant of synthetic variety named54Q14. In one such embodiment, the cells regenerate plants havingsubstantially all the morphological and physiological characteristics ofthe synthetic alfalfa variety named 54Q14 that are described in theattached tables. Some embodiments include such a tissue culture thatincludes cultured cells derived, in whole or in part, from a plant partselected from the group consisting of leaves, roots, root tips, roothairs, anthers, pistils, stamens, pollen, ovules, flowers, seeds,embryos, stems, buds, cotyledons, hypocotyls, cells and protoplasts.Another embodiment is an alfalfa plant regenerated from such a tissueculture, having all the morphological and physiological characteristicsof synthetic alfalfa variety 54Q14.

Some methods for regeneration of alfalfa plants from tissue culture aredescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,324,646 issued Jun. 28, 1994, which ishereby incorporated by reference. Additionally, researchers believe thatsomatic embryogenesis in alfalfa is heritable, and is controlled byrelatively few genes. Efforts at improving regeneration have thus beendirected towards isolation of the genetic control of embryogenesis, andbreeding programs which would incorporate such information. See, e.g.,M. M. Hernandez-Fernandez, and B. R. Christie, Genome 32:318-321 (1989);I. M. Ray and E. T. Bingham, Crop Science 29:1545-1548 (1989).

As used herein, the term “plant” includes plant cells, plantprotoplasts, plant cells of tissue culture from which alfalfa plants canbe regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps, and plant cells that areintact in plants or parts of plants such as pollen, flowers, seeds,leaves, stems, and the like.

Tissue culture of alfalfa is further described in Saunders, J. W. andBingham, E. T., (1971) Production of alfalfa plants from callus tissue,Crop Sci 12; 804-808, and incorporated herein by reference.

Transformation

The advent of new molecular biological techniques has allowed theisolation and characterization of genetic elements with specificfunctions, such as encoding specific protein products. Scientists in thefield of plant biology developed a strong interest in engineering thegenome of plants to contain and express foreign genetic elements, oradditional, or modified versions of native or endogenous geneticelements in order to alter the traits of a plant in a specific manner.Any DNA sequences, whether from a different species or from the samespecies, which are inserted into the genome using transformation arereferred to herein collectively as “transgenes”. In some embodiments ofthe invention, a transformed variant of 54Q14 may contain at least onetransgene but could contain at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10and/or no more than 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, or 2.Over the last fifteen to twenty years several methods for producingtransgenic plants have been developed, and the present invention alsorelates to transformed versions of the claimed alfalfa variety 54Q14 aswell as hybrid combinations thereof.

Numerous methods for plant transformation have been developed, includingbiological and physical plant transformation protocols. See, forexample, Miki et al., “Procedures for Introducing Foreign DNA intoPlants” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick,B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages67-88 and Armstrong, “The First Decade of Maize Transformation: A Reviewand Future Perspective” (Maydica 44:101-109, 1999). Specific to alfalfa,see “Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of alfalfa usingsecondary somatic embryogenic callus”, Journal of the Korean Society ofGrassland Science 20 (1): 13-18 2000, E. Charles Brummer, “ApplyingGenomics to Alfalfa Breeding Programs” Crop Sci. 44:1904-1907 (2004),and “Genetic transformation of commercial breeding populations ofalfalfa (Medicago sativa)” Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 42 (2):129-140 1995 which are incorporated by reference for this purpose. Inaddition, expression vectors and in vitro culture methods for plant cellor tissue transformation and regeneration of plants are available. See,for example, Gruber et al., “Vectors for Plant Transformation” inMethods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick, B. R. andThompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 89-119.

The most prevalent types of plant transformation involve theconstruction of an expression vector. Such a vector comprises a DNAsequence that contains a gene under the control of or operatively linkedto a regulatory element, for example a promoter. The vector may containone or more genes and one or more regulatory elements.

A genetic trait which has been engineered into the genome of aparticular alfalfa plant using transformation techniques, could be movedinto the genome of another population using traditional breedingtechniques that are well known in the plant breeding arts. For example,a backcrossing approach may be used to move a transgene from atransformed alfalfa plant to an elite population, and the resultingprogeny would then comprise the transgene(s).

Various genetic elements can be introduced into the plant genome usingtransformation. These elements include, but are not limited to genes;coding sequences; inducible, constitutive, and tissue specificpromoters; enhancing sequences; and signal and targeting sequences. Forexample, see the traits, genes and transformation methods listed in U.S.Pat. No. 6,118,055.

With transgenic plants according to the present invention, a foreignprotein can be produced in commercial quantities. Thus, techniques forthe selection and propagation of transformed plants, which are wellunderstood in the art, yield a plurality of transgenic plants that areharvested in a conventional manner, and a foreign protein then can beextracted from a tissue of interest or from total biomass. Proteinextraction from plant biomass can be accomplished by known methods whichare discussed, for example, by Heney and Orr, Anal. Biochem. 114: 92-6(1981).

A genetic map can be generated, primarily via conventional RestrictionFragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLP), Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)analysis, Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR) and Single NucleotidePolymorphisms (SNP) that identifies the approximate chromosomal locationof the integrated DNA molecule. For exemplary methodologies in thisregard, see Glick and Thompson, Methods in Plant Molecular Biology andBiotechnology 269-284 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993). Specific toalfalfa, see Construction of an improved linkage map of diploid alfalfa(Medicago sativa), Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100 (5): 641-657March, 2000 and Isolation of a full-length mitotic cyclin cDNA cloneCycIIIMs from Medicago sativa: Chromosomal mapping and expression, PlantMolecular Biology 27 (6): 1059-1070 1995 which are incorporated byreference for this purpose.

Wang et al. discuss “Large Scale Identification, Mapping and Genotypingof Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Human Genome”, Science,280:1077-1082, 1998, and similar capabilities are becoming increasinglyavailable for many plant genomes. Map information concerning chromosomallocation is useful for proprietary protection of a subject transgenicplant. If unauthorized propagation is undertaken and crosses made withother germplasm, the map of the integration region can be compared tosimilar maps for suspect plants to determine if the latter have a commonparentage with the subject plant. Map comparisons would involvehybridizations, RFLP, PCR, SSR and sequencing, all of which areconventional techniques. SNPs may also be used alone or in combinationwith other techniques.

Likewise, by means of the present invention, plants can be geneticallyengineered to express various phenotypes of agronomic interest. Throughthe transformation of alfalfa the expression of genes can be altered toenhance disease resistance, insect resistance, herbicide resistance,agronomic, grain quality and other traits. Transformation can also beused to insert DNA sequences which control or help controlmale-sterility. DNA sequences native to alfalfa as well as non-nativeDNA sequences can be transformed into alfalfa and used to alter levelsof native or non-native proteins. Various promoters, targetingsequences, enhancing sequences, and other DNA sequences can be insertedinto the alfalfa genome for the purpose of altering the expression ofproteins. Reduction of the activity of specific genes (also known asgene silencing, or gene suppression) is desirable for several aspects ofgenetic engineering in plants.

Many techniques for gene silencing are well known to one of skill in theart, including but not limited to knock-outs (such as by insertion of atransposable element such as mu (Vicki Chandler, The Maize Handbook ch.118 (Springer-Verlag 1994) or other genetic elements such as a FRT, Loxor other site specific integration site, antisense technology (see,e.g., Sheehy et al. (1988) PNAS USA 85:8805-8809; and U.S. Pat. Nos.5,107,065; 5,453,566; and 5,759,829); co-suppression (e.g., Taylor(1997) Plant Cell 9:1245; Jorgensen (1990) Trends Biotech.8(12):340-344; Flavell (1994) PNAS USA 91:3490-3496; Finnegan et al.(1994) Bio/Technology 12: 883-888; and Neuhuber et al. (1994) Mol. Gen.Genet. 244:230-241); RNA interference (Napoli et al. (1990) Plant Cell2:279-289; U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,323; Sharp (1999) Genes Dev. 13:139-141;Zamore et al. (2000) Cell 101:25-33; and Montgomery et al. (1998) PNASUSA 95:15502-15507), virus-induced gene silencing (Burton, et al. (2000)Plant Cell 12:691-705; and Baulcombe (1999) Curr. Op. Plant Bio.2:109-113); target-RNA-specific ribozymes (Haseloff et al. (1988) Nature334: 585-591); hairpin structures (Smith et al. (2000) Nature407:319-320; WO 99/53050; and WO 98/53083); MicroRNA (Aukerman & Sakai(2003) Plant Cell 15:2730-2741); ribozymes (Steinecke et al. (1992) EMBOJ. 11:1525; and Perriman et al. (1993) Antisense Res. Dev. 3:253);oligonucleotide mediated targeted modification (e.g., WO 03/076574 andWO 99/25853); Zn-finger targeted molecules (e.g., WO 01/52620; WO03/048345; and WO 00/42219); and other methods or combinations of theabove methods known to those of skill in the art.

Exemplary nucleotide sequences that may be altered by geneticengineering include, but are not limited to, those categorized below.

1. Transgenes that Confer Resistance to Insects or Disease and thatEncode:

-   -   (A) Plant disease resistance genes. Plant defenses are often        activated by specific interaction between the product of a        disease resistance gene (R) in the plant and the product of a        corresponding avirulence (Avr) gene in the pathogen. A plant        variety can be transformed with cloned resistance gene to        engineer plants that are resistant to specific pathogen strains.        See, for example Jones et al., Science 266: 789 (1994) (cloning        of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum);        Martin et al., Science 262: 1432 (1993) (tomato Pto gene for        resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato encodes a protein        kinase); Mindrinos et al., Cell 78: 1089 (1994) (Arabidopsis        RSP2 gene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae); McDowell &        Woffenden, (2003) Trends Biotechnol. 21(4): 178-83 and Toyoda et        al., (2002) Transgenic Res. 11(6):567-82. A plant resistant to a        disease is one that is more resistant to a pathogen as compared        to the wild type plant.    -   (B) A Bacillus thuringiensis protein, a derivative thereof or a        synthetic polypeptide modeled thereon. See, for example, Geiser        et al., Gene 48: 109 (1986), who disclose the cloning and        nucleotide sequence of a Bt delta-endotoxin gene. Moreover, DNA        molecules encoding delta-endotoxin genes can be purchased from        American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Md.), for example,        under ATCC Accession Nos. 40098, 67136, 31995 and 31998. Other        examples of Bacillus thuringiensis transgenes being genetically        engineered are given in the following patents and patent        applications and hereby are incorporated by reference for this        purpose: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,188,960; 5,689,052; 5,880,275; WO        91/14778; WO 99/31248; WO 01/12731; WO 99/24581; WO 97/40162 and        U.S. application Ser. Nos. 10/032,717; 10/414,637; and        10/606,320.    -   (C) An insect-specific hormone or pheromone such as an        ecdysteroid and juvenile hormone, a variant thereof, a mimetic        based thereon, or an antagonist or agonist thereof. See, for        example, the disclosure by Hammock et al., Nature 344: 458        (1990), of baculovirus expression of cloned juvenile hormone        esterase, an inactivator of juvenile hormone.    -   (D) An insect-specific peptide which, upon expression, disrupts        the physiology of the affected pest. For example, see the        disclosures of Regan, J. Biol. Chem. 269: 9 (1994) (expression        cloning yields DNA coding for insect diuretic hormone receptor);        Pratt et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 163: 1243 (1989) (an        allostatin is identified in Diploptera puntata); Chattopadhyay        et al. (2004) Critical Reviews in Microbiology 30 (1): 33-54        2004; Zjawiony (2004) J Nat Prod 67 (2): 300-310; Carlini &        Grossi-de-Sa (2002) Toxicon, 40 (11): 1515-1539; Ussuf et        al. (2001) Curr Sci. 80 (7): 847-853; and Vasconcelos &        Oliveira (2004) Toxicon 44 (4): 385-403. See also U.S. Pat. No.        5,266,317 to Tomalski et al., who disclose genes encoding        insect-specific toxins.    -   (E) An enzyme responsible for a hyperaccumulation of a        monterpene, a sesquiterpene, a steroid, hydroxamic acid, a        phenylpropanoid derivative or another non-protein molecule with        insecticidal activity.    -   (F) An enzyme involved in the modification, including the        post-translational modification, of a biologically active        molecule; for example, a glycolytic enzyme, a proteolytic        enzyme, a lipolytic enzyme, a nuclease, a cyclase, a        transaminase, an esterase, a hydrolase, a phosphatase, a kinase,        a phosphorylase, a polymerase, an elastase, a chitinase and a        glucanase, whether natural or synthetic. See PCT application WO        93/02197 in the name of Scott et al., which discloses the        nucleotide sequence of a callase gene. DNA molecules which        contain chitinase-encoding sequences can be obtained, for        example, from the ATCC under Accession Nos. 39637 and 67152. See        also Kramer et al., Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 23: 691 (1993),        who teach the nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding tobacco        hookworm chitinase, and Kawalleck et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21:        673 (1993), who provide the nucleotide sequence of the parsley        ubi4-2 polyubiquitin gene, U.S. application Ser. Nos.        10/389,432, 10/692,367, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,563,020.    -   (G) A molecule that stimulates signal transduction. For example,        see the disclosure by Botella et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 24: 757        (1994), of nucleotide sequences for mung bean calmodulin cDNA        clones, and Griess et al., Plant Physiol. 104: 1467 (1994), who        provide the nucleotide sequence of a maize calmodulin cDNA        clone.    -   (H) A hydrophobic moment peptide. See PCT application WO        95/16776 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,580,852 (disclosure of peptide        derivatives of Tachyplesin which inhibit fungal plant pathogens)        and PCT application WO 95/18855 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,607,914)        (teaches synthetic antimicrobial peptides that confer disease        resistance).    -   (I) A membrane permease, a channel former or a channel blocker.        For example, see the disclosure by Jaynes et al., Plant Sci. 89:        43 (1993), of heterologous expression of a cecropin-beta lytic        peptide analog to render transgenic tobacco plants resistant to        Pseudomonas solanacearum.    -   (J) A viral-invasive protein or a complex toxin derived        therefrom. For example, the accumulation of viral coat proteins        in transformed plant cells imparts resistance to viral infection        and/or disease development effected by the virus from which the        coat protein gene is derived, as well as by related viruses. See        Beachy et al., Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 28: 451 (1990). Coat        protein-mediated resistance has been conferred upon transformed        plants against alfalfa mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus,        tobacco streak virus, potato virus X, potato virus Y, tobacco        etch virus, tobacco rattle virus and tobacco mosaic virus. Id.    -   (K) An insect-specific antibody or an immunotoxin derived        therefrom. Thus, an antibody targeted to a critical metabolic        function in the insect gut would inactivate an affected enzyme,        killing the insect. Cf Taylor et al., Abstract 497, SEVENTH        INT'L SYMPOSIUM ON MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS        (Edinburgh, Scotland, 1994) (enzymatic inactivation in        transgenic tobacco via production of single-chain antibody        fragments).    -   (L) A virus-specific antibody. See, for example, Tavladoraki et        al., Nature366: 469 (1993), who show that transgenic plants        expressing recombinant antibody genes are protected from virus        attack.    -   (M) A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a        pathogen or a parasite. Thus, fungal endo        alpha-1,4-D-polygalacturonases facilitate fungal colonization        and plant nutrient release by solubilizing plant cell wall        homo-alpha-1,4-D-galacturonase. See Lamb et al., Bio/Technology        10: 1436 (1992). The cloning and characterization of a gene        which encodes a bean endopolygalacturonase-inhibiting protein is        described by Toubart et al., Plant J. 2: 367 (1992).    -   (N) A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a        plant. For example, Logemann et al., Bio/Technology 10: 305        (1992), have shown that transgenic plants expressing the barley        ribosome-inactivating gene have an increased resistance to        fungal disease.    -   (O) Genes involved in the Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR)        Response and/or the pathogenesis related genes. Briggs, S.,        Current Biology, 5(2):128-131 (1995), Pieterse & Van Loon (2004)        Curr. Opin. Plant Bio. 7(4):456-64 and Somssich (2003) Cell        113(7):815-6.    -   (P) Antifungal genes (Cornelissen and Melchers, Pl. Physiol.        101:709-712, (1993) and Parijs et al., Planta        183:258-264, (1991) and Bushnell et al., Can. J. of Plant Path.        20(2):137-149 (1998). Also see U.S. application Ser. No.        09/950,933.    -   (Q) Detoxification genes, such as for fumonisin, beauvericin,        moniliformin and zearalenone and their structurally related        derivatives. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,931.    -   (R) Cystatin and cysteine proteinase inhibitors. See U.S.        application Ser. No. 10/947,979.    -   (S) Defensin genes. See WO03000863 and U.S. application Ser. No.        10/178,213.    -   (T) Genes conferring resistance to nematodes. See WO 03/033651        and Urwin et al., Planta 204:472-479 (1998), Williamson (1999)        Curr Opin Plant Bio. 2(4):327-31.

2. Transgenes that Confer Resistance to a Herbicide, for Example:

-   -   (A) A herbicide that inhibits the growing point or meristem,        such as an imidazolinone or a sulfonylurea. Exemplary genes in        this category code for mutant ALS and AHAS enzyme as described,        for example, by Lee et al., EMBO J. 7: 1241 (1988), and Miki et        al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 449 (1990), respectively. See also,        U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,011; 5,013,659; 5,141,870; 5,767,361;        5,731,180; 5,304,732; 4,761,373; 5,331,107; 5,928,937; and        5,378,824; and international publication WO 96/33270, which are        incorporated herein by reference for this purpose.    -   (B) Glyphosate (resistance imparted by mutant        5-enolpyruvl-3-phosphikimate synthase (EPSP) and aroA genes,        respectively) and other phosphono compounds such as glufosinate        (phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) and Streptomyces        hygroscopicus phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (bar) genes),        and pyridinoxy or phenoxy proprionic acids and cycloshexones        (ACCase inhibitor-encoding genes). See, for example, U.S. Pat.        No. 4,940,835 to Shah et al., which discloses the nucleotide        sequence of a form of EPSPS which can confer glyphosate        resistance. U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,061 to Barry et al. also        describes genes encoding EPSPS enzymes. See also U.S. Pat. Nos.        6,566,587; 6,338,961; 6,248,876 B1; 6,040,497; 5,804,425;        5,633,435; 5,145,783; 4,971,908; 5,312,910; 5,188,642;        4,940,835; 5,866,775; 6,225,114 B1; 6,130,366; 5,310,667;        4,535,060; 4,769,061; 5,633,448; 5,510,471; Re. 36,449; RE        37,287 E; and 5,491,288; and international publications        EP1173580; WO 01/66704; EP1173581 and EP1173582, which are        incorporated herein by reference for this purpose. Glyphosate        resistance is also imparted to plants that express a gene that        encodes a glyphosate oxido-reductase enzyme as described more        fully in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,776,760 and 5,463,175, which are        incorporated herein by reference for this purpose. In addition        glyphosate resistance can be imparted to plants by the over        expression of genes encoding glyphosate N-acetyltransferase.        See, for example, U.S. application Ser. Nos. US01/46227;        10/427,692 and 10/427,692. A DNA molecule encoding a mutant aroA        gene can be obtained under ATCC accession No. 39256, and the        nucleotide sequence of the mutant gene is disclosed in U.S. Pat.        No. 4,769,061 to Comai. European Patent Application No. 0 333        033 to Kumada et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,374 to Goodman et        al. disclose nucleotide sequences of glutamine synthetase genes        which confer resistance to herbicides such as        L-phosphinothricin. The nucleotide sequence of a        phosphinothricin-acetyl-transferase gene is provided in European        Patent No. 0 242 246 and 0 242 236 to Leemans et al. De Greef et        al., Bio/Technology 7: 61 (1989), describe the production of        transgenic plants that express chimeric bar genes coding for        phosphinothricin acetyl transferase activity. See also, U.S.        Pat. Nos. 5,969,213; 5,489,520; 5,550,318; 5,874,265; 5,919,675;        5,561,236; 5,648,477; 5,646,024; 6,177,616 B1; and 5,879,903,        which are incorporated herein by reference for this purpose.        Exemplary genes conferring resistance to phenoxy proprionic        acids and cycloshexones, such as sethoxydim and haloxyfop, are        the Accl-S1, Accl-S2 and Accl-S3 genes described by Marshall et        al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 435 (1992).    -   (C) A herbicide that inhibits photosynthesis, such as a triazine        (psbA and gs+ genes) and a benzonitrile (nitrilase gene).        Przibilla et al., Plant Cell 3: 169 (1991), describe the        transformation of Chlamydomonas with plasmids encoding mutant        psbA genes. Nucleotide sequences for nitrilase genes are        disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,648 to Stalker, and DNA        molecules containing these genes are available under ATCC        Accession Nos. 53435, 67441 and 67442. Cloning and expression of        DNA coding for a glutathione S-transferase is described by Hayes        et al., Biochem. J. 285: 173 (1992).    -   (D) Acetohydroxy acid synthase, which has been found to make        plants that express this enzyme resistant to multiple types of        herbicides, has been introduced into a variety of plants (see,        e.g., Hattori et al. (1995) Mol Gen Genet 246:419). Other genes        that confer resistance to herbicides include: a gene encoding a        chimeric protein of rat cytochrome P4507A1 and yeast        NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (Shiota et al. (1994) Plant        Physiol. 106:17), genes for glutathione reductase and superoxide        dismutase (Aono et al. (1995) Plant Cell Physiol 36:1687, and        genes for various phosphotransferases (Datta et al. (1992) Plant        Mol Biol 20:619).    -   (E) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (protox) is necessary for the        production of chlorophyll, which is necessary for all plant        survival. The protox enzyme serves as the target for a variety        of herbicidal compounds. These herbicides also inhibit growth of        all the different species of plants present, causing their total        destruction. The development of plants containing altered protox        activity which are resistant to these herbicides are described        in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,288,306 B1; 6,282,837 B1; and 5,767,373; and        international publication WO 01/12825.

3. Transgenes that Confer or Contribute to an Altered GrainCharacteristic, Such as:

-   -   (A) Altered fatty acids, for example, by:        -   (1) Down-regulation of stearoyl-ACP desaturase to increase            stearic acid content of the plant. See Knultzon et al.,            Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2624 (1992) and WO99/64579            (Genes for Desaturases to Alter Lipid Profiles in Corn).        -   (2) Elevating oleic acid via FAD-2 gene modification and/or            decreasing linolenic acid via FAD-3 gene modification (see            U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,063,947; 6,323,392; 6,372,965 and WO            93/11245).        -   (3) Altering conjugated linolenic or linoleic acid content,            such as in WO 01/12800.        -   (4) Altering LEC1, AGP, Dek1, Superal1, mi1ps, various 1pa            genes such as lpa1, lpa3, hpt or hggt. For example, see WO            02/42424, WO 98/22604, WO 03/011015, U.S. Pat. No.            6,423,886, U.S. Pat. No. 6,197,561, U.S. Pat. No. 6,825,397,            US2003/0079247, US2003/0204870, WO02/057439, WO03/011015 and            Rivera-Madrid, R. et. al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.            92:5620-5624 (1995).    -   (B) Altered phosphorus content, for example, by:        -   (1) Introduction of a phytase-encoding gene would enhance            breakdown of phytate, adding more free phosphate to the            transformed plant. For example, see Van Hartingsveldt et            al., Gene 127: 87 (1993), for a disclosure of the nucleotide            sequence of an Aspergillus niger phytase gene.        -   (2) Up-regulation of a gene that reduces phytate content. In            alfalfa, this, for example, could be accomplished, by            cloning and then re-introducing DNA associated with one or            more of the alleles, such as the LPA alleles, identified in            maize mutants characterized by low levels of phytic acid,            such as in Raboy et al., Maydica 35: 383 (1990) and/or by            altering inositol kinase activity as in WO 02/059324,            US2003/0009011, WO 03/027243, US2003/0079247, WO 99/05298,            U.S. Pat. No. 6,197,561, U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,224, U.S. Pat.            No. 6,391,348, WO2002/059324, US2003/0079247, Wo98/45448,            WO99/55882, WO01/04147.    -   (C) Altered carbohydrates effected, for example, by altering a        gene for an enzyme that affects the branching pattern of starch        or a gene altering thioredoxin (See U.S. Pat. No. 6,531,648).        See Shiroza et al., J. Bacteriol. 170: 810 (1988) (nucleotide        sequence of Streptococcus mutans fructosyltransferase gene),        Steinmetz et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 200: 220 (1985) (nucleotide        sequence of Bacillus subtilis levansucrase gene), Pen et al.,        Bio/Technology 10: 292 (1992) (production of transgenic plants        that express Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase), Elliot et        al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21: 515 (1993) (nucleotide sequences of        tomato invertase genes), Søgaard et al., J. Biol. Chem. 268:        22480 (1993) (site-directed mutagenesis of barley alpha-amylase        gene), and Fisher et al., Plant Physiol. 102: 1045 (1993) (maize        endosperm starch branching enzyme II), WO 99/10498 (improved        digestibility and/or starch extraction through modification of        UDP-D-xylose 4-epimerase, Fragile 1 and 2, Ref1, HCHL, C4H),        U.S. Pat. No. 6,232,529 (method of producing high oil seed by        modification of starch levels (AGP)). The fatty acid        modification genes mentioned above may also be used to affect        starch content and/or composition through the interrelationship        of the starch and oil pathways.    -   (D) Altered antioxidant content or composition, such as        alteration of tocopherol or tocotrienols. For example, see U.S.        Pat. No. 6,787,683, US2004/0034886 and WO 00/68393 involving the        manipulation of antioxidant levels through alteration of a phytl        prenyl transferase (ppt), WO 03/082899 through alteration of a        homogentisate geranyl geranyl transferase (hggt).    -   (E) Altered essential seed amino acids. For example, see U.S.        Pat. No. 6,127,600 (method of increasing accumulation of        essential amino acids in seeds), U.S. Pat. No. 6,080,913 (binary        methods of increasing accumulation of essential amino acids in        seeds), U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,389 (high lysine), WO99/40209        (alteration of amino acid compositions in seeds), WO99/29882        (methods for altering amino acid content of proteins), U.S. Pat.        No. 5,850,016 (alteration of amino acid compositions in seeds),        WO98/20133 (proteins with enhanced levels of essential amino        acids), U.S. Pat. No. 5,885,802 (high methionine), U.S. Pat. No.        5,885,801 (high threonine), U.S. Pat. No. 6,664,445 (plant amino        acid biosynthetic enzymes), U.S. Pat. No. 6,459,019 (increased        lysine and threonine), U.S. Pat. No. 6,441,274 (plant tryptophan        synthase beta subunit), U.S. Pat. No. 6,346,403 (methionine        metabolic enzymes), U.S. Pat. No. 5,939,599 (high sulfur), U.S.        Pat. No. 5,912,414 (increased methionine), WO98/56935 (plant        amino acid biosynthetic enzymes), WO98/45458 (engineered seed        protein having higher percentage of essential amino acids),        WO98/42831 (increased lysine), U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,436        (increasing sulfur amino acid content), U.S. Pat. No. 5,559,223        (synthetic storage proteins with defined structure containing        programmable levels of essential amino acids for improvement of        the nutritional value of plants), WO96/01905 (increased        threonine), WO95/15392 (increased lysine), US2003/0163838,        US2003/0150014, US2004/0068767, U.S. Pat. No. 6,803,498,        WO01/79516, and WO00/09706 (Ces A: cellulose synthase), U.S.        Pat. No. 6,194,638 (hemicellulose), U.S. Pat. No. 6,399,859 and        US2004/0025203 (UDPGdH), U.S. Pat. No. 6,194,638 (RGP).

4. Genes that Control Male-Sterility. There are several methods ofconferring genetic male sterility available, such as multiple mutantgenes at separate locations within the genome that confer malesterility, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,654,465 and 4,727,219 toBrar et al. and chromosomal translocations as described by Patterson inU.S. Pat. Nos. 3,861,709 and 3,710,511. In addition to these methods,Albertsen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,432,068, describe a system of nuclearmale sterility which includes: identifying a gene which is critical tomale fertility; silencing this native gene which is critical to malefertility; removing the native promoter from the essential malefertility gene and replacing it with an inducible promoter; insertingthis genetically engineered gene back into the plant; and thus creatinga plant that is male sterile because the inducible promoter is not “on”resulting in the male fertility gene not being transcribed. Fertility isrestored by inducing, or turning “on”, the promoter, which in turnallows the gene that confers male fertility to be transcribed.

-   -   (A) Introduction of a deacetylase gene under the control of a        tapetum-specific promoter and with the application of the        chemical N-Ac-PPT (WO 01/29237).    -   (B) Introduction of various stamen-specific promoters (WO        92/13956, WO 92/13957).    -   (C) Introduction of the barnase and the barstar gene (Paul et        al. Plant Mol. Biol. 19:611-622, 1992).    -   For additional examples of nuclear male and female sterility        systems and genes, see also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,859,341; U.S. Pat.        No. 6,297,426; U.S. Pat. No. 5,478,369; U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,524;        U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,014; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,265,640; all of        which are hereby incorporated by reference.

5. Genes that create a site for site specific DNA integration. Thisincludes the introduction of FRT sites that may be used in the FLP/FRTsystem and/or Lox sites that may be used in the Cre/Loxp system. Forexample, see Lyznik, et al., Site-Specific Recombination for GeneticEngineering in Plants, Plant Cell Rep (2003) 21:925-932 and WO 99/25821,which are hereby incorporated by reference. Other systems that may beused include the Gin recombinase of phage Mu (Maeser et al., 1991; VickiChandler, The Maize Handbook ch. 118 (Springer-Verlag 1994), the Pinrecombinase of E. coli (Enomoto et al., 1983), and the R/RS system ofthe pSR1 plasmid (Araki et al., 1992).

6. Genes that affect abiotic stress resistance (including but notlimited to flowering, ear and seed development, enhancement of nitrogenutilization efficiency, altered nitrogen responsiveness, droughtresistance or tolerance, cold resistance or tolerance, and saltresistance or tolerance) and increased yield under stress. For example,see: WO 00/73475 where water use efficiency is altered throughalteration of malate; U.S. Pat. No. 5,892,009, U.S. Pat. No. 5,965,705,U.S. Pat. No. 5,929,305, U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,859, U.S. Pat. No.6,417,428, U.S. Pat. No. 6,664,446, U.S. Pat. No. 6,706,866, U.S. Pat.No. 6,717,034, U.S. Pat. No. 6,801,104, WO2000060089, WO2001026459,WO2001035725, WO2001034726, WO2001035727, WO2001036444, WO2001036597,WO2001036598, WO2002015675, WO2002017430, WO2002077185, WO2002079403,WO2003013227, WO2003013228, WO2003014327, WO2004031349, WO2004076638,WO9809521, and WO9938977 describing genes, including CBF genes andtranscription factors effective in mitigating the negative effects offreezing, high salinity, and drought on plants, as well as conferringother positive effects on plant phenotype; US2004/0148654 and WO01/36596where abscisic acid is altered in plants resulting in improved plantphenotype such as increased yield and/or increased tolerance to abioticstress; WO2000/006341, WO04/090143, U.S. application Ser. Nos.10/817,483 and 09/545,334 where cytokinin expression is modifiedresulting in plants with increased stress tolerance, such as droughttolerance, and/or increased yield. Also see WO0202776, WO2003052063,JP2002281975, U.S. Pat. No. 6,084,153, WO0164898, U.S. Pat. No.6,177,275, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,547 (enhancement of nitrogenutilization and altered nitrogen responsiveness). For ethylenealteration, see US20040128719, US20030166197 and WO200032761. For planttranscription factors or transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress,see e.g. US20040098764 or US20040078852.

Other genes and transcription factors that affect plant growth andagronomic traits such as yield, flowering, plant growth and/or plantstructure, can be introduced or introgressed into plants, see e.g.WO97/49811 (LHY), WO98/56918 (ESD4), WO97/10339 and U.S. Pat. No.6,573,430 (TFL), U.S. Pat. No. 6,713,663 (FT), WO96/14414 (CON),WO96/38560, WO01/21822 (VRN1), WO00/44918 (VRN2), WO99/49064 (GI),WO00/46358 (FRI), WO97/29123, U.S. Pat. No. 6,794,560, U.S. Pat. No.6,307,126 (GAI), WO99/09174 (D8 and Rht), and WO2004076638 andWO2004031349 (transcription factors).

TABLE 3 Yield data for 54Q14 in DM in T/A compared to other varieties atmultiple locations. Date Har- Re- Test Planted Syn vest No. bound LSD CVLocation Mo/Yr Gen Year Cuts 54Q14 6.0 55V12 55Q27 .05 % Arlington5/2011 2 2012 3 5.67 5.66 5.50 6.11 0.62 7.8 WI 2013 4 9.47 9.36 9.209.69 0.62 4.6 East Lansing 5/2010 1 2011 4 6.70 6.63 6.88 5.97 1.10 10.4MI 2012 4 3.30 3.55 3.31 3.24 Platteville 5/2011 2 2012 4 9.82 10.148.88 9.36 1.26 9.7 WI 2013 4 8.66 8.45 8.74 8.07 0.88 7.5 Connell 4/20132 2014 5 16.63 14.84 16.27 0.92 4.0 WA Guelph 6/2011 2 2012 3 3.64 3.533.31 3.68 0.45 9.2 ON

TABLE 4 Mean Annual Yield in Tons DM/Acre. No of Total Years No. of Re-Variety Har- Har- bound names vested vests 54Q14 6.0 55V12 55Q27 54Q14 831 7.98 Check 1 7 26 6.75 6.76 Rebound 6.0 Check 2 8 31 7.98 7.58 55V12Check 3 8 31 7.98 7.80 55Q27

TABLE 5 Persistence data for 54Q14 compared to other varieties (Percentof stand). % Stand Check Varieties Date of Re- Readings bound Date No.of (Mo/Yr) 54Q14 6.0 55Q27 Test Syn Seeded Years No. of Initial/Initial/ Initial/ Initial/ LSD CV Location Gen Mo/Yr Hrvstd Hrvsts FinalFinal Final Final .05 % Arlington 2 5/2011 3 10 7/11,  99/96  99/91 99/95 1.6/3.4 1.1/2.5 WI 9/13 Platteville 2 5/2011 3 11 7/11, 100/98100/99 100/98 0.7/3.3 0.5/2.3 WI 9/13

TABLE 6 Fall dormancy as determined from spaced plantings relative tothree standard check varieties. Test conducted by Pioneer Hi-BredInternational, Inc., now S&W Seed Company, at Arlington, WI. DormancyScore or Date of Date Average Syn Last Cut Measured LSD CV FDC HeightGen (Mo/Yr) (Mo/Yr) .05 % 54Q14 4 17 2 09/13 10/14 2.4 9.9 CheckVarieties Maverick 1.0 Vernal 2.0 5246 3.0 14 Legend 4.0 16 Archer 5.020 ABI 700 6.0 Doña Ana 7.0 Pierce 8.0 CUF 101 9.0 UC-1887 10.0 UC-146511.0

TABLE 7 Anthracnose (Race 1) Disease Scores for 54Q14. Greenhouse Testconducted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., now S&W Seed Company,at Arlington, WI. Resistance Year Syn Unadjusted Adjusted Variety ClassTested Gen % R % R 54Q14 HR 2010 2 61 66 Arc HR 65 70 Saranac AR RSaranac S 4 4 Test Mean: 59 64 L.S.D. (.05%) 14 15 C.V. (%) 17 17

TABLE 8 Bacterial Wilt Disease Scores for 54Q14. Greenhouse Testconducted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., now S&W Seed Company,at Arlington, WI. Resistance Year Syn Unadjusted Adjusted Variety ClassTested Gen % R % R 54Q14 HR 2014 2 80 68 Vernal R 47 40 Narragansett SSonora S 5 4 Test Mean: 54 46 L.S.D. (.05%) 11 9 C.V. (%) 11 11

TABLE 9 Fusarium Wilt Disease Scores for 54Q14. Greenhouse Testconducted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., now S&W Seed Company,at Arlington, WI. Resistance Year Syn Unadjusted Adjusted Variety ClassTested Gen % R % R 54Q14 HR 2014 2 60 73 Agate Field HR Agate GH HR 3745 Moapa 69 Field HR Moapa 69 GH HR Narragansett MR Field NarragansettGH N/A MNGN-1 S 2 2 Test Mean: 39 47 L.S.D. (.05%) 11 13 C.V. (%) 20 20

TABLE 10 Verticillium Wilt Disease Scores for 54Q14. Greenhouse Testconducted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., now S&W Seed Company,at Arlington, WI. Resistance Year Syn Unadjusted Adjusted Variety ClassTested Gen % R % R 54Q14 HR 2011 2 57 67 Vertus R 34 40 Oneida VR HRSaranac S 2 2 Test Mean: 51 60 L.S.D. (.05%) 21 25 C.V. (%) 34 34

TABLE 11 Phytophthora Root Rot Disease Scores for 54Q14. Greenhouse andSeedling Test conducted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., now S&WSeed Company, at Arlington, WI. Resistance Year Syn Unadjusted AdjustedVariety Class Tested Gen % R % R 54Q14 HR 2010 2 75 69 WAPH-1 HR 60 55(seedling) MNP-D1 R (seedling) Agate R Saranac S 0 0 Test Mean: 57 52L.S.D. (.05%) 17 16 C.V. (%) 21 21

TABLE 12 Aphanomyces Root Rot (Race 1) Disease Scores for 54Q14.Greenhouse Test conducted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., nowS&W Seed Company, at Arlington, WI. Resistance Year Syn UnadjustedAdjusted Variety Class Tested Gen % R % R 54Q14 HR 2010 2 64 71 WAPH-1 R45 50 (Race 1) WAPH-1 S (Race 2) WAPH-5 R (Race 2) Saranac S 4 4 (Races1 & 2) Test Mean: 51 53 L.S.D. (.05%) 11 13 C.V. (%) 16 16

TABLE 13 Pea Aphid Insect Scores for 54Q14. Greenhouse Test conducted byPioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., now S&W Seed Company, at Arlington,WI. Resistance Year Syn Unadjusted Adjusted Variety Class Tested Gen % R% R 54Q14 R 2014 2 36 40 CUF-101 HR PA-1 HR 49 55 Kanza R Baker RCaliverde S Moapa 69 S Vernal S 5 6 Ranger S Test Mean: 31 35 L.S.D.(.05%) 11 12 C.V. (%) 25 25

TABLE 14 Spotted Alfalfa Aphid Insect Scores for 54Q14. Greenhouse Testconducted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., now S&W Seed Company,at Connell, WA. Resistance Year Syn Unadjusted Adjusted Variety ClassTested Gen % R % R 54Q14 R 2011 2 45 47 CUF-101 HR 58 60 Baker R MesaSirsa R Kanza R Caliverde S Arc S OK08 S Ranger S 1 1 Test Mean: 36 37L.S.D. (.05%) 14 15 C.V. (%) 27 28

TABLE 15 Aphanomyces Root Rot (Race 2) Disease Scores for 54Q14. LabTest conducted by Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., now S&W SeedCompany, at Arlington, WI. Resistance Year Syn Unadjusted AdjustedVariety Class Tested Gen % R % R 54Q14 R 2014 2 42 46 WAPH-1 (Race 1)WAPH-1 3 3 (Race 2) WAPH-5 46 50 (Race 2) Saranac (Races 1 2 2 & 2) TestMean: 31 33 L.S.D. (.05%) 15 16 C.V. (%) 34 34

TABLE 16 Root Knot Nematode (M. hapla) Disease Scores for 54Q14.Controlled Environment Greenhouse Test conducted by Pioneer Hi-BredInternational, Inc., now S&W Seed Company, at Connell, WA. ResistanceYear Syn Unadjusted Adjusted Variety Class Tested Gen % R % R 54Q14 R2010 2 44 51 M. hapla Nevada HR Syn XX Nevada HR 77 90 Syn YY Apollo IIS Lahontan S 7 8 M. incognita & M. javanica Moapa 69 R Lahontan SCaliverde S Test Mean: 48 56 L.S.D. 19 22 (.05%) C.V. (%) 25 25

All disease tests conducted for National Alfalfa and MiscellaneousLegume Variety Review Board for AOSCA certification and were conductedby standard procedures and scoring systems as described in the NAAICStandard Tests to Characterize Alfalfa Cultivars, maintained online onthe NAAIC's website.

It is understood that the above description is intended to beillustrative, and not restrictive. Many other embodiments will beapparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the abovedescription. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determinedwith reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope ofequivalents to which such claims are entitled.

DEPOSITS

On Dec. 9, 2015, Applicant deposited 2500 seeds of Alfalfa Variety 54Q14with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 UniversityBoulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110-2209, USA under ATCC Accession No.PTA-122710. Prior to the deposit, the seeds were maintained by S&W SeedCompany, 7108 N. Fresno Street, Suite 380, Fresno, Calif., 93720, USA(S&W) and previously maintained as alfalfa variety 10XXP11 by PioneerHi-Bred International, Inc., 7250 NW 62nd Avenue, Johnston, Iowa, 50131(Pioneer). The transfer of maintenance for the seeds from Pioneer to S&Woccurred on or about Dec. 31, 2014. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §1.808(a)(1),during the pendency of this application, access to the deposit will bemade available to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks and personsdetermined by the Commissioner to be entitled thereto upon request.Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §1.808(a)(2), upon the granting of the patent, allrestrictions imposed upon the availability of the deposit to the publicwill be irrevocably removed. This deposit of the Alfalfa Variety 54Q14seeds will be maintained in the ATCC depository, which is a publicdepository, for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the most recentrequest, or for the enforceable life of the patent, whichever is longer,and will be replaced if it becomes nonviable during that period.Additionally, Applicant has or will satisfy all of the requirements of37 C.F.R. §§1.801-1.809, including providing an indication of theviability of the sample upon deposit. Applicant has no authority towaive any restrictions imposed by law on the transfer of biologicalmaterial or its transportation in commerce. Applicant does not waive anyinfringement of rights granted under this patent or under the PlantVariety Protection Act (7 USC §2321 et seq.).

We claim:
 1. Seed of an Alfalfa Variety 54Q14, representative seedhaving been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-122710.
 2. Analfalfa plant, or a part thereof, produced by growing the seed ofclaim
 1. 3. Pollen of the plant of claim
 2. 4. An ovule from the plantof claim
 2. 5. A tissue culture of regenerable cells or regenerableprotoplasts from the plant of claim
 2. 6. A tissue culture according toclaim 5, wherein a cell or protoplast of the tissue culture is derivedfrom a tissue or cell selected from the group consisting of leaves,roots, root tips, root hairs, anthers, pistils, stamens, pollen, ovules,flowers, seeds, embryos, stems, buds, cotyledons, hypocotyls, cells andprotoplasts.
 7. An alfalfa plant regenerated from the tissue culture ofclaim 5, wherein the regenerated plant has all of the morphological andphysiological characteristics of alfalfa variety 54Q14, representativeseed of said alfalfa variety having been deposited under ATCC AccessionNumber PTA-122710.
 8. A process for producing a first generation progenyalfalfa seed comprising crossing a first parent alfalfa plant with asecond parent alfalfa plant and harvesting the resultant alfalfa seed,wherein said first parent alfalfa plant or said second parent alfalfaplant is the alfalfa plant of claim
 2. 9. A process for producing analfalfa plant or a part thereof comprising growing the seed of claim 1.10. A process for engineering a transformed plant population from thealfalfa plant or plant part of claim 2 comprising the steps of: (a)constructing an expression vector comprising at least one gene; (b)introducing the expression vector into the alfalfa plant or the plantpart to produce a transformed alfalfa plant or plant part; and (c)breeding the transformed alfalfa plant or plant part with anotheralfalfa plant population to produce a transformed alfalfa progeny plantpopulation comprising the at least one transgene.
 11. The seed of claim1 further comprising a transgene.
 12. The seed of claim 11 wherein thetransgene confers a trait selected from the group consisting ofherbicide resistance, insect resistance, disease resistance, improveddigestibility, improved energy content, male sterility, and improvedwinterhardiness.
 13. A process for producing another synthetic varietywherein the alfalfa seed of claim 1 is combined with seed of one or moreother alfalfa plants.
 14. A process for producing alfalfa seed bygrowing the alfalfa plant or plant part of claim 2 and allowing thealfalfa plant or plant part to cross pollinate with one or moredifferent alfalfa plants.
 15. A process for producing an alfalfa seedcomprising harvesting the seed of the alfalfa plant or plant part ofclaim 2.